Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry / La Revue canadienne de psychiatrie ; 66(1):34-42, 2021.
Article in French | APA PsycInfo | ID: covidwho-1801489

ABSTRACT

Objective: Examine the association between news media use frequency during the COVID-19 pandemic and the scale of psychological distress in pregnant women, considering this distress known harmful effects on the fetus development. Method: Pregnant women living in Quebec province (N = 1014) have been recruited in April 2020 through social media, while a state of health emergency was declared. Participants were divided in 4 groups, according to self-reported frequency of news media consulting (little or none;one time a day;several times a day;constant). They filled measures of depressive symptoms, negative affects, post-traumatic stress symptoms and anxiety specific to COVID-19. Instrument scores were grouped under a unique factor of psychological distress. Results: An ANCOVA controlling for age, gestational age, education level, household annual revenue and a diagnosed mental disorder present at the time of participation in study shows that news media exposure frequency is significantly associated with psychological distress severity in pregnant women, during COVID-19 pandemic, F(3,998) = 27.02, p < 0.001, eta2 partial = 0.08. Given the mean comparisons a posteriori, higher psychological distress rates are found as soon as news media exposure exceeds once a day (effect sizes between 0.38 and 0.81). Conclusions: The more pregnant women report consulting the news media during the COVID-19 pandemic, the more likely they are to exhibit psychological distress. Results provide one of the first empirical supports to recommendations of World Health Organization, Canada government and psychiatric associations that encourage population to limit their news media consulting during the COVID-19 pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) (French) Objectif: Examiner l'association entre la frequence d'utilisation des medias d'information durant la pandemie de COVID-19 et l'ampleur de la detresse psychologique chez les femmes enceintes, considerant les impacts deleteres connus de cette detresse sur le developpement du foetus. Methode: Des femmes enceintes habitant la province de Quebec (N = 1014) ont ete recrutees en avril 2020 par le biais des medias sociaux, alors qu'un etat d'urgence sanitaire prevalait. Les participantes ont ete divisees en quatre groupes, selon la frequence auto-rapportee de consultation des medias d'information (peu ou pas;une fois par jour;plusieurs fois par jour;constante). Elles ont rempli des mesures des symptomes depressifs, des affects negatifs, des symptomes de stress post-traumatique et d'anxiete specifique de la COVID-19. Les scores aux instruments se regroupaient sous un facteur unique de detresse psychologique. Resultats: Une ANCOVA controlant pour l'age, l'age gestationnel, le niveau d'education, le revenu familial annuel et la presence d'un trouble mental diagnostique au moment de la participation a l'etude montre que la frequence d'exposition aux medias d'information est significativement associee a la severite de la detresse psychologique chez les femmes enceintes au moment de la pandemie de COVID-19, F(3,998) = 27,02, p < 0,001, eta2 partiel = 0,08. Selon les comparaisons de moyennes a posteriori, des taux plus eleves de detresse psychologique s'observent des que l'exposition aux medias d'information depasse une fois par jour (tailles de l'effet entre 0,38 et 0,81). Conclusions: Plus les femmes enceintes consultent les medias d'information pendant la pandemie de COVID-19, plus elles sont sujettes a presenter de la detresse psychologique. Les resultats offrent un des premiers appuis empiriques aux recommandations de l'Organisation mondiale de la sante, du gouvernement du Canada et d'associations de psychiatres encourageant la population a limiter sa consultation des medias d'information durant la pandemie de COVID-19. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

2.
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health ; 16(1): 28, 2022 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1770561

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An upsurge in psychological distress was documented in pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated with a longitudinal design whether prenatal and postnatal maternal distress during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with lower infant socioemotional development. METHODS: Pregnant women (N = 468, Mage = 30,00, 97.6% White) were recruited during the first COVID-19 mandatory lockdown in Quebec, Canada, from April 2nd to April 13th 2020 and were re-contacted at two months postpartum to complete self-reported measures of general (i.e. not specifically related to the COVID-19 pandemic) anxio-depressive symptoms and infant development. Structural equation modeling analyses were performed using maximum likelihood parameter estimation. RESULTS: Higher maternal prenatal distress significantly contributed to poorer infant socioemotional development. A mediation model showed that postnatal distress significantly mediated the association between prenatal distress and infant socioemotional development, whereas the direct effect of prenatal distress was no longer significant. Prenatal and postnatal maternal distress accounted for 13.7% of the variance in infant socioemotional development. CONCLUSION: Our results call for special means of clinical surveillance in mothers and for innovative (online) interventions aiming to support maternal mental health during pregnancy and after delivery.

3.
Can J Psychiatry ; 66(1): 34-42, 2021 01.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1189987

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Examine the association between news media use frequency during the COVID-19 pandemic and the scale of psychological distress in pregnant women, considering this distress known harmful effects on the fetus development. METHOD: Pregnant women living in Quebec province (N = 1014) have been recruited in April 2020 through social media, while a state of health emergency was declared. Participants were divided in 4 groups, according to self-reported frequency of news media consulting (little or none; one time a day; several times a day; constant). They filled measures of depressive symptoms, negative affects, post-traumatic stress symptoms and anxiety specific to COVID-19. Instrument scores were grouped under a unique factor of psychological distress. RESULTS: An ANCOVA controlling for age, gestational age, education level, household annual revenue and a diagnosed mental disorder present at the time of participation in study shows that news media exposure frequency is significantly associated with psychological distress severity in pregnant women, during COVID-19 pandemic, F(3,998) = 27.02, p < 0.001, η2 partial = 0.08. Given the mean comparisons a posteriori, higher psychological distress rates are found as soon as news media exposure exceeds once a day (effect sizes between 0.38 and 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: The more pregnant women report consulting the news media during the COVID-19 pandemic, the more likely they are to exhibit psychological distress. Results provide one of the first empirical supports to recommendations of World Health Organization, Canada government and psychiatric associations that encourage population to limit their news media consulting during the COVID-19 pandemic.


OBJECTIF: Examiner l'association entre la fréquence d'utilisation des médias d'information durant la pandémie de COVID-19 et l'ampleur de la détresse psychologique chez les femmes enceintes, considérant les impacts délétères connus de cette détresse sur le développement du fœtus. MÉTHODE: Des femmes enceintes habitant la province de Québec (N = 1014) ont été recrutées en avril 2020 par le biais des médias sociaux, alors qu'un état d'urgence sanitaire prévalait. Les participantes ont été divisées en quatre groupes, selon la fréquence auto-rapportée de consultation des médias d'information (peu ou pas; une fois par jour; plusieurs fois par jour; constante). Elles ont rempli des mesures des symptômes dépressifs, des affects négatifs, des symptômes de stress post-traumatique et d'anxiété spécifique de la COVID-19. Les scores aux instruments se regroupaient sous un facteur unique de détresse psychologique. RÉSULTATS: Une ANCOVA contrôlant pour l'âge, l'âge gestationnel, le niveau d'éducation, le revenu familial annuel et la présence d'un trouble mental diagnostiqué au moment de la participation à l'étude montre que la fréquence d'exposition aux médias d'information est significativement associée à la sévérité de la détresse psychologique chez les femmes enceintes au moment de la pandémie de COVID-19, F(3,998) = 27,02, p < 0,001, η2 partiel = 0,08. Selon les comparaisons de moyennes a posteriori, des taux plus élevés de détresse psychologique s'observent dès que l'exposition aux médias d'information dépasse une fois par jour (tailles de l'effet entre 0,38 et 0,81). CONCLUSIONS: Plus les femmes enceintes consultent les médias d'information pendant la pandémie de COVID-19, plus elles sont sujettes à présenter de la détresse psychologique. Les résultats offrent un des premiers appuis empiriques aux recommandations de l'Organisation mondiale de la santé, du gouvernement du Canada et d'associations de psychiatres encourageant la population à limiter sa consultation des médias d'information durant la pandémie de COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Communications Media/statistics & numerical data , Depression/epidemiology , Pregnant Women/psychology , Psychological Distress , Adult , Anxiety/psychology , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Quebec/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Young Adult
4.
Personal Disord ; 13(1): 41-51, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1012656

ABSTRACT

Among at-risk groups for psychological distress in the context of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, pregnant women might be especially vulnerable. Identifying subgroups of pregnant women at high risk of poor adaptation might optimize clinical screening and intervention, which could, in turn, contribute to mitigating the potentially devastating effects of prenatal stress on mothers and fetus. Level of personality functioning may be a good indicator of who may be more vulnerable to distress in challenging periods like the COVID-19 pandemic, as adults with high levels of personality dysfunction may experience significant difficulties in mentalizing threatening situations. The aims of the present study are (a) to determine the impact of level of personality pathology on affective, behavioral, and thought problems in pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic; and (b) to test a model where mentalization of trauma mediates the impact of personality pathology on symptomatology. Data from 1,207 French-Canadian pregnant women recruited through social media during the COVID-19 pandemic were analyzed. Latent profile analysis, using the Criterion A elements of the alternative model for personality disorders (Identity, Self-Direction, Empathy, Intimacy) as latent indicators, yielded four profiles: Healthy, Mild Self-Impairment, Intimacy Impairment, and Personality Disorder. Profiles showed significant associations with diverse indicators of symptomatology. Mediation models showed both direct and indirect (through mentalization of trauma) significant associations between level of personality functioning and affective/behavioral/thought problems. Results have clinical implications on prophylactic measures for at-risk pregnant women, especially in challenging contexts such as the COVID-19 pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Canada , Female , Humans , Pandemics , Personality , Personality Disorders , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 99(7): 848-855, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-589406

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Prenatal maternal distress has a negative impact on the course of pregnancy, fetal development, offspring development, and later psychopathologies. The study aimed to determine the extent to which the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may aggravate the prenatal distress and psychiatric symptomatology of pregnant women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two cohorts of pregnant volunteer women were evaluated, one that was recruited before the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 496) through advertisements in prenatal clinics in Quebec, Canada, from April 2018 to March 2020; the other (n = 1258) was recruited online during the pandemic from 2 April to 13 April 2020. Prenatal distress and psychiatric symptomatology were measured with the Kessler Distress Scale (K10), Post-traumatic Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-II), and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). RESULTS: The 1754 pregnant women (Mage  = 29.27, SD = 4.23) were between 4 and 41 gestational weeks (M = 24.80, SD = 9.42), were generally educated (91.3% had post-high-school training), and financially well-resourced (85.3% were above the low-income cut-off). A multivariate analysis of covariance controlling for age, gestational age, household income, education, and lifetime psychiatric disorders showed a large effect size (ES) in the difference between the two cohorts on psychiatric symptoms (Wilks' λ = 0.68, F6,1400  = 108.50, P < .001, partial η2  = 0.32). According to post-hoc analyses of covariance, the COVID-19 women reported higher levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms (ES = 0.57), dissociative symptoms (ES = 0.22 and ES = 0.25), symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (ES = 0.19), and negative affectivity (ES = 0.96), and less positive affectivity (ES = 0.95) than the pre-COVID-19 cohort. Women from the COVID-19 cohort were more likely than pre-COVID-19 women to present clinically significant levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms (OR = 1.94, χ2 [1] = 10.05, P = .002). Multiple regression analyses indicated that pregnant women in the COVID-19 cohort having a previous psychiatric diagnosis or low income would be more prone to elevated distress and psychiatric symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women assessed during the COVID-19 pandemic reported more distress and psychiatric symptoms than pregnant women assessed before the pandemic, mainly in the form of depression and anxiety symptoms. Given the harmful consequences of prenatal distress on mothers and offspring, the presently observed upsurge of symptoms in pregnant women calls for special means of clinical surveillance.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Coronavirus Infections , Depression , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Pregnancy Complications , Pregnant Women/psychology , Stress, Psychological , Adult , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/etiology , Anxiety/physiopathology , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Canada/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/etiology , Depression/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/physiopathology , Pregnancy Complications/psychology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , SARS-CoV-2 , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/etiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/prevention & control , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Stress, Psychological/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL